Email Sign-up:
Facts of Life: Chapter 18: The International Abortion Situation: The Status of Abortion Legislation in North America PDF Print E-mail
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The Status of Abortion Legislation in North America. As of July 1, 2007, the USA and Canada had a total population of 338,844,000 people in a land area of 18,387,481 square kilometers, for an average density of 18 people per square kilometer, about one-third of the world average.
       The average weighted total fertility rates (TFRs) of the USA and Canada have decreased from 3.60 in 1965 to 1.72 in 2007, a 52 percent decrease. The impact of population growth deceleration in North America has been softened by two factors: (1) the "baby boom echo," and (2) the high childbearing rates of immigrant families.
       Neither the USA nor Canada give any protection to their preborn citizens. In fact, Canada has absolutely no restrictions on abortion whatsoever in its law; the only other countries in the world where preborn babies have no protection at all are the People's Republic of China (PRC) and South Africa. Of course, the situation is the same in the United States, despite the Supreme Court decision allowing the banning of the gruesome partial-birth abortion procedure.



       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in Central America. As of July 1, 2007, the eight nations of Central America have a total population of 147,944,000 people in a land area of 2,433,773 square kilometers, for an average density of 61 people per square kilometer, slightly above the world average.
       The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the Central American nations have plunged from 6.77 children per woman in 1965 to 3.01 in 2007, a total decline of 56 percent. The highest 2007 TFR for Central America is Guatemala's 3.90 children per woman, and the lowest is Panama's 2.31.
       Mexico suffered a tremendous 71% reduction in TFR during the time period 1965-2007, plunging to below replacement at 1.96, the greatest TFR reduction of any nation in Central America.
       El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua all have laws that fully protect preborn children or allow for only a "life of the mother" exception, although many illegal abortions occur.



       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in the Caribbean. As of July 1, 2007, the 25 nations of the Caribbean have a total population of 41,225,000 people in a land area of 227,300 square kilometers, for an average density of 181 people per square kilometer, about three and a half times the world average.
       The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the Caribbean nations have declined from 5.49 children per woman in 1965 to 2.15 in 2007, a total decline of 61 percent. The highest 2007 TFR for the Caribbean is Haiti's 3.30 children per woman, followed by the Dominican Republic at 2.56. Every one of the other twelve Caribbean nations with a population of more than 100,000 was under replacement as of July 1, 2007, with the lowest TFR belonging to Barbados at 1.25 children per woman, the lowest in the Americas.
       Cuba suffered a 74% reduction in TFR during the period 1965-2007, highest in the region and tied for seventh in the world.
       Of all of the Caribbean nations, only the Dominican Republic and Haiti have laws that fully protect preborn children. Four nations — Barbados, Cuba, Puerto Rico, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines — have abortion on demand.



       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in South America. As of July 1, 2007, the 14 nations of continental South America have a total population of 383,787,000 people in a land area of 17,522,287 square kilometers, for an average density of 22 people per square kilometer, less than half of the world average.

       The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the nations of South America have dropped from 5.77 children per woman in 1965 to 2.07 in 2007, a total decline of 64 percent to just under replacment. The highest 2007 TFR for South America is Bolivia's 3.25 children per woman. Chile has the lowest TFR at 1.69. The greatest drop in TFR among South America's nations over the time period 1965-2007 was Colombia's 71 percent.
       The most populous countries in South America are Brazil with 191,930,000 people (fifth in the world), with Colombia and Argentina a distant second and third at 46 million and 39 million respectively.
       Reflecting its strong Catholic heritage, South America is relatively friendly towards preborn children. The only countries with abortion on demand laws are the small nations French Guiana, Guyana and the Netherlands Antilles. Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, Suriname and Venezuela all have laws that fully protect preborn children or allow for only a "life of the mother" exception — although massive numbers of illegal abortions occur, often supported by international population control organizations.
       However, this situation is changing, for several reasons. Anti-population groups have targeted the South American countries with the highest TFR for special attention. Subversive groups such as 'Catholics' for a Free Choice (CFFC) hold huge conferences and peddle vast quantities of propaganda undermining Church teachings on abortion, contraception and sterilization. And numerous Protestant sects, which generally hold permissive or "neutral" positions on divorce, fornication, adultery, contraception and abortion, are growing rapidly in predominantly Catholic countries.



       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in Europe. As of July 1, 2007, the 47 nations of Europe have a total population of 727,597,000 people in a land area of 11,344,828 square kilometers, for an average density of 64 people per square kilometer, a little more than the world average

       The direct cause of abortion is the separation of sex from procreation. Nowhere is this more obvious than in Europe, which has been in the grip of the anti-life mentality since just after World War I.
       The demographic effects of anti-life policies are becoming obvious. The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the nations of Europe have dropped disastrously from2.58 children per woman in 1965 to an incredible 1.20 in 2007, a total decline of 53 percent from an already-low figure. The highest 2007 TFR for Europe is Albania's 1.81 children per woman, followed by Ireland's 1.71.
       Every one of Europe's 47 nations are currently under replacement fertility levels. Nine European nations have remained continuously below replacement level since 1965. The greatest decrease in TFR during the time period 1965-2007 is Tunisia's 77 percent, fifth highest decline in the world; not one European nation has increased its TFR from 1965 to 2007.

       Thirty-four of the fifty lowest TFRs in the world belong to European countries. Four nations — Belarus, Ukraine, Poland and Bosnia and Herzegovina — have sunk below one child per family.
       There are currently 29 countries in the world whose population is actually declining. 25 of these are in Europe!
       The most populous countries in Europe are the Russian Federation with 141,436,000 people (ninth in the world, but rapidly declining), Germany with 82 million, and France, Italy and the United Kingdom, all with about 60 million.
       The only European country with laws that fully protect preborn children or allow for only a "life of the mother" exception is tiny Malta, home to just 0.05 percent of Europe's population. Ireland's traditional protection of preborn children is eroding rapidly, with thousands of Irish women and girls travelling legally into England for abortions each year.
       Almost all of the other European nations have actual or practical abortion on demand. These nations represent 94 percent of the total population of Europe.
       The nations of Europe are already feeling the profound demographic effects of their longtime anti-life policies. These include:

• Significant imbalances in population segments, leading to increased aging of the work force and the population. This, in turn, results in fewer workers supporting more retired people (creating great pressure on social security systems and retirement plans) and greatly increased health care costs, leading to a strong push for euthanasia.

 

• A great increase in the number of divorces (from 125,000 in 1960 to about 750,000 in 2004); illegitimacy (4.5 percent of all births in 1960 to about 25 percent in 2004); unemployment (from five million in 1977 to more than 15 million in 2004); and a huge increase in abortions, from about 250,000 in 1960 to more than a million today among the EC12 countries alone.[55]

 

• An influx of up to 50 million Muslims by 2025, mainly from North Africa. Because they are a very religious people, Muslims tend to integrate poorly with secular European society, a situation causing great tension and conflict that will only worsen in the future.[56] This state of affairs is a direct result of falling Europe birthrates; the last year "native" Europeans replaced themselves was 1973, and since then, there has been a shortfall of tens of millions of births required to replace the population.[57]

 

• The economic future of Europe is in grave doubt. The dreaded "Demographic Cross" feared by racists and advocates of the principle of "differential fertility" is finally coming to pass.
       In the year 1950, Europe was still relatively young, and comprised more than a fifth of the world's population. Meanwhile, Africa was home to less than ten percent of the world's people. But while Africans continued to have large families, Europeans began to abort, sterilize and contracept themselves out of existence. The continents "crossed over" in about 1995, with each possessing about one out of every eight of the world's people. By 2050, their sizes will have reversed: Africa will have more than one out of every five people, and Europe will have only one out of fourteen. Even more importantly, the average African will be barely 30 years old, while the average European will 53 years old!
       To whom will the future belong — a young, vigorous, large population, or an old, small, hopeless one?
       The answer to that question will be obvious to anyone with a background in social science.
       The table below shows the basic figures from the United Nations Population Information Network (POPIN).

 

 

The "Demographic Cross" Between Africa and Europe

 

Percent of
World Population


Average Age (years)

Area

1950

2000

2050

1950

2000

2050

Europe

21.7%

12.0%

7.2%

29.7

37.6

53.3

Africa

8.9%

13.4%

21.7%

19.0

18.4

30.5

World

23.9

26.8

43.1

Reference:  United Nations Population Information Network. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision and World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 Revision, all found at http://esa.un.org/unpp. The low variant is used because it is historically the most accurate for population projections.



       Some European countries are trying to reverse their plunging birthrates, but with little success. History shows us that once the people of a nation are conditioned to believe they should live for themselves and that children are a burden, it is virtually impossible to persuade them otherwise. The only answer is for pro-life activists to convert the hearts and minds of the people, one by one. This will take as long to do as the population controllers took to destroy the European's love of children.
       For example, European population alarmists have been exaggerating the high cost of raising kids for decades as a ploy to get people to have fewer children. When the baleful demographic effects of too few babies become evident, the governments try to retool the thinking of the people, but with little effect.
       This is why the La France a besoin des enfants! [France needs babies!] campaign failed.[58] And this is why, when the German State of Brandenburg offered to pay its citizens US $650 to have a child, there was not even the slightest blip in the birth rate. No wonder Wolfgang Jahmer, director of a social welfare program in Schwerin, Germany, said that "We have some fears that the tree of life may be falling."[59]



       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in the Middle East. As of July 1, 2007, the sixteen nations and autonomous regions of the Middle East have a total population of 274,581,000 people in a land area of 5,991,345 square kilometers, for an average density of 46 people per square kilometer, a little more than half of the world's average.
       The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the nations of the Middle East have dropped from 6.77 children per woman in 1965 to 2.69 in 2007, a total decline of 60 percent.
       The highest 2007 TFR in the Middle East is Yemen's 5.40 children per woman. Five Middle Eastern nations are below replacement fertility: Iran at 1.79, Lebanon at 1.96, Bahrain and Kuwait at 2.01, and Turkey at 2.06.
       The largest drop in TFRs among Middle Eastern nations during the period 1965-2007 were Iran at 74%, Kuwait at 73%, and Bahrain at 72%.
       The most populous countries in the Middle East are Turkey with 77,308,000 people and Iran with 73,422,000 people.
       The only Middle Eastern countries that have abortion on demand laws are Turkey and Israel, while Saudi Arabia and Jordan have exceptions.



       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in Africa. As of July 1, 2007, the 56 nations of Africa have a total population of 972,761,000 people in a land area of 29,803,673 square kilometers, for an average density of 33 people per square kilometer, about half of the world's average.
       The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the nations of Africa have dropped from 6.87 children per woman in 1965 to 4.42 in 2007, a total decline of 36 percent, the lowest of any continent.
       This means Africa has by far the highest TFR of any region of the world, more than double that of Asia. This is why Africa is becoming the number one target of the 'developed' countries' population control efforts.
       The highest 2007 TFR in the world is Niger's 6.94 children per woman. The only African nations below replacement fertility are Tunisia at 1.68 and Mauritius at 1.61 children per completed family.
       One African nation — The Democratic Republic of the Congo — actually increased its TFR from 6.20 to 6.45 during the period 1965-2007.
       The largest drop in TFR among African nations during the period 1965-2007 was Tunisia at 77 percent, the fifth most severe decline in the world.
       The most populous countries in Africa are Nigeria with 149,232,000 people (eighth in the world), followed by Ethiopia with 84 million and Egypt with 76 million.
       The only African countries that have abortion on demand laws are Cape Verde, Tunisia, South Africa and Zambia. In many nations such as Guinea-Bissau, the law states that abortion is only allowed to save the life of the mother. However, the law is not enforced and abortion is largely tolerated. The same law exists in Mozambique, but 'official interpretation' allows abortion on all grounds.



      
The South African Situation. The strong-arm tactics of the African National Congress/South African Communist Party (ANC/SACP) were blatant even by pro-abortion standards when the South African parliament passed its Termination of Pregnancy Bill in 1996, giving South Africa the dubious distinction of having the worst abortion law on earth.

       Every South African poll showed that every social and political group overwhelmingly opposed abortion on demand, by an average margin of two to one. In fact, the highest degree of opposition was among rank-and-file ANC supporters, at 77 percent.[60] Yet Nelson Mandela's party, while calling itself "democratic," simply ignored the wishes of its own constituency.
       South Africa's Freedom of Choice Bill specifies a fine of 100,000 Rand ($22,000 US) and 10 years' imprisonment on the first offense for anyone obstructing abortion in any way. This includes doctors who refuse to refer for abortions. This means conscientious Catholic (and other) doctors face a brutal three-way choice: take part in procuring abortions (an excommunicable offense), give up practicing medicine, or go to jail for a decade.
       South African pro-abortionists have promised to use the new laws to prosecute every pro-life doctor in the land, and have vowed to demand long jail terms for any pro-lifers who take part in any kind of civil disobedience or even picketing in front of abortion mills.[61]


 


       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in Asia. As of July 1, 2007, the 50 nations of Asia have a total population of 4,032,000,000 people in a land area of 31,041,967 square kilometers, for an average density of 130 people per square kilometer, about three times the world average. Asia has about 60 percent of the world's population, living on land with an average population density equal to that of Ohio, Pennsylvania or Florida.[62]

      The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the nations of Asia have dropped from 5.65 children per woman in 1965 to 2.09 in 2007, a total decline of 63 percent. This steep decline is the highest of any continent in the world.
       The highest 2007 TFR for Asia is Timor-Leste's 6.28 children per woman, followed by Yemen's 5.25. Macau has the lowest TFR in the world at 0.66 children per family (or, in other words, two children for each three families), followed closely by the second lowest TFR in the world (Hong Kong's 0.72) and the fourth lowest (South Korea's 0.96).
       The four largest drops in TFR in the world during the time period 1965-2007 belonged to Asian countries: Macao at -87%; Hong Kong at -86%, South Korea at -83%, and Singapore at -80%.
       The most populous countries in Asia are the People's Republic of China with 1,325,937,000 people (leading the world), followed by India with 1,171,656,000 (second in the world) and Indonesia with 231,618,000 (fourth in the world behind the USA).
       Slightly less than half of Asia's nations (18) either provide full protection for their preborn citizens or have narrow exceptions. Sadly, these countries are home to only about one-fifth of the total population of Asia.



       
The Status of Abortion Legislation in Oceania. As of July 1, 2007, the 14 nations of Oceania have a total population of 34,300,000 people in a land area of 8,423,218 square kilometers, for an average density of justfour people per square kilometer, by far the lowest population density of any continent in the world.
       The average total fertility rates (TFRs) of the nations of Oceania have dropped from 3.98 children per woman in 1965 to 2.05 in 2007, a total decline of 48 percent.
       The highest 2007 TFR in Oceania is the nation of Micronesia's 3.46 children per woman. Australia has the lowest TFR at 1.54, and New Zealand is close behind at 1.74.
       The largest drop in TFR during the time period 1965-2007 was New Caledonia's 65 percent.
       The most populous countries in Oceania are Australia with 20,747,000 people, followed by Papua New Guinea with 6,360,000 and New Zealand with 4,174,000.
       Five of Oceania's nations protect their preborn citizens with laws banning abortion except for narrow exceptions. Four countries and protectorates (Australia, Fiji, Guam and New Zealand) have actual or practical abortion on demand

 

 

 

Go To Next Topic: Important Web Sites

 

 

Return to The International Abortion Situation Table of Contents

 

 

Endnotes for “The Status of Abortion Legislation in North America”

[55] R. Clarke. "Population Imbalances: The Consequences." Forum [Council of Europe], 1986, pages 5 to 7. 

[56] Calculations and extrapolations based on figures from the Institut National d'Etudes Demographique (INED). "Short Fall in Births Europe." Population, July/September 1983. 

[57] Ibid. 

[58] French national ad campaign. Daniela Deane. "Birth Rates Down Across Europe." USA Today, October 15, 1997. 

[59] Stephen Kinzer, New York Times News Service. "German State Pays Bounty for Babies." The Oregonian, November 25, 1994, page A13. 

[60] Brian Stuart. "Row Brews over Bill for Abortion on Demand." The Citizen [Johannesburg], April 7, 1996, pages 1 and 2. 

[61] Personal communications with Claude Newbury, M.D., former President of Pro-Life South Africa. Dr. Newbury was forced to leave South Africa for London after this law was passed in order to avoid being sentenced to prison for a long term for refusing to perform abortions. 

[62] United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States: The National Data Book. 1999 (119th Edition) [Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1999], table 35, "State Population Projections: 2000 to 2025." 

[63] French Social Affairs Minister Jacques Solideau, quoted in "In Defense of Population Growth." The New Scientist, September 8, 1984.