1.
What is an exorcism?
Q: I saw your article about a post-exorcism experience
on Spirit Daily. Just what is an exorcism and is it anything
like the movies?
A:
Exorcisms are rarely similar to what is portrayed in the movies
such as The Exorcist or The Exorcism of Emily Rose
(see below). There are certainly points of comparison, but
Hollywood needs theatrics to dress up or sensationalize an experience
of something extraordinary like the supernatural battle against
evil. The exaggerations of Hollywood only serve to diminish our
sense of the reality of evil and the existence of the devil. Anyone
who really wants to know what the devil operates like—both
in his power and in his weakness—ought to help a priest in
a real exorcism. It’s quite an experience.
Fundamentally,
an exorcism is a potent prayer calling down the power of God to
free an individual who is oppressed or possessed by the devil. It
is not a sacrament. It is a sacramental: that is, an object, prayer
or devotional tool that God can use to communicate grace to men’s
souls and whose efficacy derives not from the intrinsic nature of
the thing itself (like a sacrament) but from the subjective faith
with which a person uses or receives it.
Formal
exorcisms may only be performed by a priest with the requisite qualifications
according to canon law, and for lawfulness they must be authorized
by a bishop (canon 1172). The Catholic Church has a ritual of exorcism,
revised in 1999, that is used by the priest in the performance of
an exorcism. An exorcist may also use the ritual that was promulgated
in 1614. In my opinion there is not even the slightest comparison
of the two—the 1614 ritual is infinitely better. Only after
serious investigation and sometimes accompanying medical and psychological
tests is a person to be judged as needing an exorcism. The tests
are for the purpose of ruling out natural explanations and for avoiding
sensationalism about the devil. Any other types of lesser spiritual
problems and oppressions may be handled by deliverance prayers said
by priests or laymen, always according to the wise guidance of the
Church.
In
2007 I will come out with a more complete treatment of the question
of exorcism for the benefit of those who wish to understand more
about this most important gift to the Church. Also, the article
referred to in the question above can be found by Clicking
Here »
2.
Satan in the Garden of Eden
Q: Why did God allow Satan into the Garden of Eden? Once
he was thrown into Hell by St. Michael, why was he allowed more
influence? (Sent by R.W. from WI)
A:
It is easier to start with the last question first and work backward.
As a matter of fact the account that you refer to of the expulsion
of the devil by St. Michael (Rev 12:7-8) makes it clear that what
Michael accomplishes is only an expulsion from heaven and
not a casting down to hell. There is a big difference.
Michael’s job was to exorcise the Evil One’s vile presence
from the dwelling of Almighty God and purify the heavenly places
of anything unclean (see Rev 21:27).
The
Book of Revelation goes on to say that the place where Satan and
his minions were thrust down to was in fact earth. Earth
is the “battlefield” between heaven and hell. Verse
9 of chapter 12 states that clearly: “The huge dragon, the
ancient serpent known as the devil or Satan, the seducer of the
whole world, was driven out; he was hurled down to earth and his
minions with him.” How does the author of Revelation react
at the thought of this fearsome prospect for humanity? “But
woe to you earth and sea, for the devil has come down upon you.
His fury knows no limits, for he knows his time is short.”
(Rev 12:12) That is a frightening reality indeed. But since Satan
cannot destroy God, and he was proven less powerful than God’s
faithful angels, he attacks “those who keep the commandments
of God and give witness to Jesus.” (Rev. 12:17)
The
first part of the question thus answers itself. The devil is able
to be in the Garden of Eden because his new place of haunting is
the earth and as a free being he was like all the other animals
that God created and not excluded from the Garden of Eden. Originally,
there was no fiery Seraphim set at the gates of the Garden of Eden
to keep anyone out as was the case after the Fall of Adam
and Eve. One gets the impression, however, that God allowed the
devil to enter there with the larger purpose of testing our first
parents’ obedience to the limits He had placed upon them as
creatures. God foreknew that Adam and Eve would fail the test, but
His permissive will had determined that the devil and his temptations
would be instruments of testing for strengthening the love and freedom
of his people.
As
far as “more influence” of the devil goes, we have to
recognize that all creatures have limits including Satan, and the
limits that God set on Satan’s destructive power are the only
reason why Satan can tempt us but not destroy us outright. It is
deeply galling to the former Seraphim angel that he is now strictly
limited in how he uses his powers against God’s children.
It’s even more galling to him that God uses him so
to speak to sanctify the faithful. In other words, the only influence
the devil has on us is the influence we freely allow him to have
over us.
3.
The Exorcism of Emily Rose
Q: Hello, I was just reading your message about Emily Rose.
Would you happen to know if, like in the movie, the real Anneliese
Michel did give a letter to the priest or if she really did see
The Blessed Mother Mary? Thank you for your time. I eagerly await
your reply. (Sent by Anon.)
A:
Some background is necessary for some of our readers who may not
be familiar with the case behind the 2006 movie The Exorcism
of Emily Rose. Apparently, a very devout 24-year old German
girl named Anneliese Michel from Klingenberg, Germany became suddenly
and mysteriously possessed in the year 1968 even though she was
from a good and practicing Catholic family. Two priests were brought
in to perform exorcisms on her since it was such a serious case
of obvious possession, and in the end, after many exorcisms correctly
performed, the girl died literally of starvation because she refused
to eat. The priests and even the family were prosecuted for the
death of the girl and one priest went to jail for some time. It
is important to note that, from the Church’s point of view,
the priests and the family did absolutely nothing wrong, but the
civil authorities were much less sympathetic.
In an article
by the main exorcist himself, Fr. Ernst Alt, he stated that yes,
Emily had written down on plain paper a series of reflections about
some visions she had had of the Virgin Mary during the course of
the exorcism. She wrote 12 numbered paragraphs that amounted to
about four handwritten sheets of paper which were entrusted to the
priest before she died. It was his desire to propagate her visions
to others in order to wake people in his country and in our world
up to the reality of the devil’s existence at a time when
it is so roundly denied and ridiculed.
The movie version
ends with her seeing a vision of the Virgin Mary who gives her the
option of freedom from the possession or remaining a victim longer
to witness to the world the reality of the devil’s presence,
and Emily chooses the more generous option of suffering longer for
the sake of others. Ultimately she dies what appears to be a difficult,
expiatory death which leads to the courtrial in the movie and reflects
the actual circumstances of what happened in the 70s. According
to her writings, apparently Anneliese was offered something of that
same option by the Virgin Mary—to suffer longer for others—and
she chose it.
In my experience
it is not uncommon for people who are possessed, even in the midst
of an exorcism, to have a vision of the Lord, the saints and angels
or the Virgin Mary. God in His Mercy knows how much these poor souls
suffer and comes to their assistance in a most extraordinary way.
To
see my article on Emily Rose Click
Here »
4.
A short reflection on demons and hell and the value of suffering
Questions
about hell and the demons are a mystery that the human mind will
never comprehend until we see God face to Face. God did not create
hell; the devil and the fallen angels did when they rejected Him.
They had to have some “place” to go (understood as a
state of existence rather than a physical place) which was the diametric
opposite of Heaven. It is a place of total pain, hatred and suffering
versus a place of total communion, light and happiness. That was
just the consequence of their flight away from Him. As the devil's
home, then, it existed from the very moment he and his apostate
angels rejected God.
The
demons are given “assignments” to destroy God's kingdom,
and that is why they are "sent" from hell to earth to
try to rob our souls. St. Peter says that we should always be vigilant
towards the devil who is like “a roaring lion, prowling about
the world seeking someone to devour.” (1 Pt 5:8). The point
of the matter is that God did not take away their free will when
they fell, but He devised a way to use it against them in the process
of our salvation.
This
is essentially why I ask people who are oppressed or possessed by
demons to offer their suffering for others. The pain they feel and
desolation is part of the mystery of God's permissive will that
"allows" these things to happen to people (usually the
ones He knows will make the best of them) for the good of others.
Those looking for profound answers to this mystery will have to
be satisfied with a simple theological truth that comes directly
from Jesus’ own Passion: all pain and suffering has a purpose
for the salvation of souls. We must just offer it as a sacrifice
to the Lord while it endures. That offering makes suffering not
a meaningless agony but a meaningful sacrifice.
Also,
the angels take great pleasure in offering the prayers and sacrifices
of the people to God with us. In the Book of Revelation there is
an angel with a thurible (the incenser used by priests in the church)
who offers up "the prayers of God's faithful people" with
the incense that ascends to heaven from his thurible (cf. Rev 8:4).
The same book tells us that the good angels outnumber the bad ones
and will never be defeated by them: Satan swept a third of the stars
(interpreted as apostate angels) from the sky when he fell (cf.
Rev 12:4) but that means that two thirds of the angels remained
faithful, exactly double the number of fallen angels. The battleground
is thus our souls on this earth, and the more we cooperate with
the good angels the stronger we get in fighting the bad ones.
|