The Degenerate Roots of “Gender” Ideology

None of the following is intended to be a personal attack on any person of any sexual orientation: homosexual, lesbian, transgender or any other. The Word of God and the Catholic Church teach us to love and respect these people, who have the same human dignity. They need our courteous help to live chastely despite issues of sexual identity. Our criticism is directed only towards the ideology that seeks to legitimize the harmful behavior and mentality of those same people, and as it applies to children, marriage, family and the society as a whole.

An ideology is a system of beliefs and values which forms the basis for a type of thought, be it political, economic, social etc. But harmful ideologies attempt the justification of a perverse vision by the dominant elites, in order to manipulate and control the rest of the population.

Perverse gender ideology consists in denying that the differences between men and women have natural and biological foundations. Instead, this thinking proposes that these differences are the fruit of a social and cultural “construction.” It alleges society and culture impose their respective roles on men and women, none of which corresponds to their natural differences.

From this erroneous start its acolytes affirm that sex is biological but sexual identity what a person decides to adopt. This is obviously contrary to Catholic belief. Therefore, say the ideologues of the “gender,” there may be different “genders” – the list as extensive as the number of people inhabiting the planet. Among these new “sexes” are lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transsexuals – hence the acronym “LGBT.”

One origin of the such gender ideology has been anti-life feminism. This feminism emerged in the USA in the 1960s, driven by the publication of the book “The Feminine Mystique” by the feminist archetype Betty Friedan. She claimed motherhood was an “obstacle” for the equality of women with respect to man and for the development of society. The problem that constituted this “biological burden” had to be solved by means of contraception and abortion, and – in time, in fact, very little time – lesbianism.

By 1969, feminists had achieved the establishment of a Chair in “Women’s Studies” at the University of San Diego, California. By the 1970s, the propagandists of extremist feminism had established the term “gender” in their elitist jargon. Another factor that gave rise to this disgusting anthropological deconstruction – again, indirectly but very real – was the sexual ideology of Alfred Kinsey, a doctor of zoology, most especially insects. Kinsey is often referenced erroneously as the father of sexual education in the US and in the rest of the world. But Kinsey and his colleagues conducted unethical sexual experiments, both in adults (who were interviewed about their sexual behaviors) and in children (who were sexually manipulated and recorded their reactions). As a result of these “studies,” Kinsey was favorably proposed to the existence of ​​”sexual outbursts” ranging from heterosexuality, through bisexuality, to homosexuality – with other perversions in between, including pedophilia.

“Courage” is a Roman Catholic apostolate that aids those with same-sex attraction.

Kinsey died in 1956, but in 1964 his colleagues established the U.S. Sexual Information and Education Council (SIECUS). By 1970, SIECUS and Planned Parenthood (see below) had already convinced the government to establish their twisted sexual ideology in sexual programs of some public schools. In 1981 Kinsey’s colleague, Wardell Pomeroy, went off a figurative cliff, publishing a book, “Boys and Sex” in which he actually spoke favorably about bestiality (sexual relations with animals). But returning to the origins of the term “gender identity,” instrumental was also a Dr. John Money, professor of psychology and sexology at Johns Hopkins University until 2006, in the USA. As early as 1955, Money had coined another euphemism: “the role of gender.” Money proposed that if a child was uncomfortable with his sex, his parents should treat him as if he were the opposite sex. That concept led to a very sad case of transsexualism, under the direction of Money himself, in which a child ended up committing suicide when he reached adulthood. Like Kinsey, Money was favorably disposed to pornography and pedophilia.

Money and other ideologues of his ilk converted the term “gender” into an ideological concept. Before the 1950s, the term “gender” applied only to grammar and not to people. Languages ​​that are based on Latin categorize nouns and their modifiers as masculine or feminine, and for this reason we still refer to them as having a gender. However, these uses differentiate from the terms “sex” and “gender” changed during the 50s and 60s because certain sexologists, including Money, realized that their agenda in favor of sex change could not be defended enough with the use of the words “sex” and “transsexual.” From a strictly scientific perspective, human beings have sex and sexual differences that are genetically determined: XX for women, XY for men. No sexologist can in fact change a person’s genes through hormones and surgeries. The change of sex is objectively impossible. The “solution” that occurred to these sexologists was to hijack the term “gender” and infuse the word with a new meaning applicable to people.

John Money, Ph.D. was one of the most prominent of these sexologists who redefined “gender” to mean “social performance that indicates an internal sexual identity.” These sexologists essentially invented the ideological foundation they needed to justify, for example, the treatment of transsexualism through surgery to “change” sex and called it “gender.” Though fabricated, this bias currently dominates mainstream medicine, psychiatry and the academic world. This linguistic history clarifies that the term “gender” is not and has never been a biological or scientific entity but rather a socially and politically invented concept.

As we know Margaret Sanger, founder of abortion giant Planned Parenthood, was a New York activist who promoted eugenics (the belief in a “superior” race), as well as contraception, abortion and sexual debauchery. Today, the directors of Planned Parenthood follow her legacy. They promote the LGBT ideology in their programs of sexual “education,” even against the will of indignant parents. The international conglomerate formed by Planned Parenthood, the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), also promotes the perverted LGBT agenda around the world. This includes Latin American countries with the approval of their interested governments. The ideology of “gender” and homosexuality are the logical result of the deliberate separation of the procreative sexual relations and the consequent degradation of marriage in the collective consciousness.

Let’s now turn to the issue of the promoters of the “gender” ideology. One of them was the former President of the United States, Barack Obama. Shortly after taking office, Obama declared himself in favor of the so-called homosexual “marriage.” From that moment his promotion of “gender” and LGBT agenda was inexorable and fanatical. Under his direction the Department of Education ordered public schools to accommodate transsexual students, on pain of losing federal subsidies. The Obama effect has also contributed to LGBT groups wanting to impose “Transsexual Awareness Month” in schools and bisexual restrooms.

Outside the U.S., the first promoter of this infamous ideology is the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990). Although it has very good articles in defense of minors, there are also others implying that they have autonomy equal to that of adults, with the consequent abuse of paternal rights. At the Beijing Conference on Women (1995), the U.N. coined the terms “gender perspective” and “gender equity.” Although in none of its multiple appearances in the final document, these ambiguous terms are equated with “various forms of family,” or families made up of two homosexuals or two lesbians. The Organization of American States (OAS) is another supranational entity dedicated in recent times to promote misguided gender bias. Already in 1994, the OAS launched the gender concept in its “Convention Against Violence Against Women.” The manipulation of noble causes is a constant strategy of this and other anti-life organizations. In 2009, the OAS proposed the inclusion of the “gender perspective” in all social programs, both hemispheric and national. The new Secretary General, Luis Almagro Lemes, is in favor of abortion, homosexual “marriage” and the legalization of marijuana – all of which he considers signs of “progress.” Finally, the OAS issued a communiqué by which it requires the countries of its hemisphere that have not legalized so-called homosexual marriage to do so. Implicit in this requirement is also the order that the LGBT ideology be implemented in all educational, health and cultural institutions of society.

There is no doubt that when a culture loses faith, the next thing it loses is the reason. We refer to practical reason, that is, wisdom or moral good sense. For that, one must turn to the doctrine of the Catholic Church and the natural law. This doctrine countermands the madness inherent in the ideology of “gender”, which is nothing but a degenerate ideology.

 

Sources
This article by Don DeMarco has been based and has its sources in the dossiers
Vida Humana Internacional, HLI Spanish, which can be found at: http://vidahumana.org/dossiers . We highlight the excellent article by Lic. Marlene Gillette-Ibern, Esq., Legal Advisor of VHI.  It has also been based on the excellent statement of the American College of Pediatricians entitled “Gender Dysphoria in Minors,” which we at Human Life International had the honor of translating into Spanish at the request of the directors of that institution. The reader should not confuse this school with the American Academy of Pediatrics, whose board, unfortunately, has accepted the ideology of “gender.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *